Taylor and Francis Online homepage

Research Management

Pertinent literature.

Sample our Economics, Finance,Business & Industry journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days

" Pertinent Literature ." Research Management , 24(2), pp. 38–39

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form . For more information, please visit our Permissions help page .

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations. Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Register now or learn more

Book cover

Using Design Research and History to Tackle a Fundamental Problem with School Algebra pp 87–114 Cite as

Review of Pertinent Literature

421 Accesses

Part of the History of Mathematics Education book series (HME)

This chapter frames the main study described in this book in terms of the theoretical positions of Charles Sanders Peirce, Johann Friedrich Herbart, and Gina Del Campo and Ken Clements. Peirce’s tripartite position on semiotics (featuring signifiers, interpretants, and signifieds), Herbart’s theory of apperception, and Del Campo and Clements’s theory of complementary receptive and expressive modes of communication, were bundled together to form a hybrid theoretical position which gave direction to the study. The chapter closes with careful statements of six research questions which emerged not only from consideration of the various literatures, but also from a knowledge of practicalities associated with the research site, from our historical analysis of the purposes of school algebra, and from our review of the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution .

Buying options

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view . New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Google Scholar  

Bedney, G., & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian theory of activity: Current applications to design and learning . New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’ thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 46 (5), 511–558.

CrossRef   Google Scholar  

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 5–23). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Blanton, M. L., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 46 (1), 39–87.

Britt, M. S., & Irwin, K. C. (2011). Algebraic thinking with and without algebraic representation: A pathway for learning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 137–157). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences , 2 , 141–178.

Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (Eds.). (2011). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives . Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., & Nie, B. (2011). Examining students’ algebraic thinking in a curricular context: A longitudinal study. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 161–185). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Campos, D. G. (2010). Peirce’s philosophy of mathematical education: Fostering reasoning abilities for mathematical inquiry. Studies in Philosophy and Education , 29 , 421–429.

Cañadas, M. C., Brizuela, B. M., & Blanton, M. (2016). Second graders articulating ideas about co-variation with linear functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior , 41 , 87–103.

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., & Schwartz, J. L. (2008). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235–272). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

CCSSM. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics . Washington, DC: Authors. [Also cited under National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010).]

Clements, M. A. (2011). Design research: Its potential for meeting Brunei Darussalam’s educational needs. In I. Cheong (Ed.), Design research in education: Empowering teachers, learners and researchers (pp. 22–40). Gadong, Brunei Darussalam: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

Clements, M. A. (2014). A historical overview of visualization and visualizing in mathematics. In M. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 177–192). New York, NY: Springer.

Clements, M. A., & Del Campo, G. (1987). Fractional understanding of fractions: Variations in children’s understanding of fractional concepts across embodiments, Grades 2 through 5. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (vol. 3, pp. 98–110). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Common Core Writing Team. (2011, May 29). Progression for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (draft). Comment at commoncoretools.wordpress.com. 1.

DeGarmo, C. (Ed.). (1900). Apperception: A monograph on psychology and pedagogy . Boston: D. C. Heath & Co.

Del Campo, G., & Clements, M. A. (1987). A manual for the professional development of teachers of beginning mathematicians . Melbourne, Australia: Association of Independent Schools of Victoria.

Del Campo, G., & Clements, M. A. (1990). Expanding the modes of communication in mathematics classrooms. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik , 11 (1), 45–99.

de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics . New York, NY: The Philosophical Library.

de Saussure, F. (1974). In C. Bally & A. Sechehaye (Eds.), Cours de linguistique générale . Paris, France: Payot.

Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1982). Intuitive functional concepts: A baseline study on intuitions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 13 , 360–380.

Dunkel, H. B. (1970). Herbart and Herbartianism: An educational ghost story . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ellerton, N. F., & Clements, M. A. (1991). Mathematics in language: A review of language factors in mathematics learning . Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.

Fried, M. (2008). History of mathematics in mathematics education: A Saussurean perspective. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast , 5 (2–3), 185–198.

Fujii, T., & Stephens, M. (2001). Fostering an understanding of algebraic generalizations through numerical expressions. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (vol. 1, pp. 258–264). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.

Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development , 38 (1), 23–30.

Gagné, R. M., & White, R. T. (1978). Memory structures and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research , 48 (2), 187–222.

Herbart, J. F. (1898). Letters and lectures on education (H. M. and E. Felkin, Trans.). London, UK: Swan Sonnenschein & Co

Herbart, J. F. (1904a). Outlines of educational doctrine . New York, NY: Macmillan.

Herbart, J. F. (1904b). The science of education . London, UK: Sonnenschein.

Hewitt, D. (1998). Approaching arithmetic algebraically. Mathematics Teaching , 163 , 19–29.

Jeon, K. (2012). Reflecting on PEMDAS. Teaching Children Mathematics , 18 (6), 370–377.

Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kanbir, S. (2014, November). Two approaches: Beginning algebra students’ variable concept development. Professional project presented to the Group for Educational Research in Mathematics at Illinois State University, Normal, IL.

Kanbir, S. (2016, April 12). Three different approaches to middle-school algebra: Results of a pilot study. Paper presented at the 2016 Research Conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, held in San Francisco, CA.

Kaput, J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group, & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering and mathematics learning and teaching . New York, NY: Routledge.

Kieran, C. (2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 11–49). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Kieran, C. (2011). Overall commentary on early algebraization: Perspectives for research and teaching. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 579–593). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior , 25 , 299–317.

Mackenzie, A. A., & White, R. T. (1982). Field-work in geography and long-term memory structures. American Educational Research Journal , 19 (4), 623–632.

Moss, J., & McNab, S. L. (2011). An approach to geometric and numeric patterning that fosters second grade students’ reasoning and generalizing about functions and co-variation. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 277–301). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Otte, M. (1998). Limits of constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce. Science and Education , 7 (5), 425–450.

Otte, M. F. (2011). Evolution, learning and semiotics from a Peircean point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 77 , 313–329.

Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Volume 1, 1867–1893). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce (vol. 2). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Presmeg, N. (2014). Mathematics education research embracing arts and sciences. In M. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 361–378). New York, NY: Springer.

Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning , 5 (1), 37–70.

Radford, L. (2004). Syntax and meaning. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 161–166). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mérida, México: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education , 40 , 317–327.

Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 303–322). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Radford, L. (2015). The epistemological foundations of the theory of objectification. Isonomia (online journal http://isonomia.uniurb.it/epistemologica ), 127–149.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). On forests, trees, elephants and classrooms: A brief for the study of learning ecologies. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education , 45 (3), 491–495.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 22 (1), 1–36.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sriraman, B. (2009). What’s all the commotion about commognition? The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast , 6 (3), 541–544.

Sriraman, B., & Lee, K.-H. (2011). Commentary on Part II. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 367–373). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 12 (2), 151–169.

Taylor-Cox, J. (2003). Algebra in the early years? Yes! Young Children , 58 (1), 14–21.

Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 20 (4), 356–366.

Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177–184). Berkeley, CA: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Warren, E., & Pierce, R. (2003). Learning and teaching algebra. In B. Perry, G. Anthony, & C. Diezmann (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia, 2000–2003 (pp. 291–312). Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.

Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, representation and the scientific understanding . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.

Westbury, I. (1980). Change and stability in the curriculum: An overview of the questions. In H. G. Steiner (Ed.), Comparative studies of mathematics curricula: Change and stability 1960–1980 (pp. 12–36). Bielefeld, Germany: Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik-Universität Bielefeld.

Wu, H. (2001). How to prepare students for algebra. American Educator , 25 (2), 10–17.

Zhang, X., Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2015a). Enriching student concept images: Teaching and learning fractions through a multiple-embodiment approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal , 27 (2), 201–231.

Zhang, X., Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2015b). Differences in student visual images of fractions before and after a teaching intervention: Does a multiple-embodiment approach to instruction make a difference? Mathematics Education Research Journal , 27 (2), 233–261.

Zhang, X., Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2015c). Engaging students with multiple models of fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics. , 22 (3), 138–147.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Mathematics Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI, USA

Sinan Kanbir

Department of Mathematics, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA

M. A. (Ken) Clements & Nerida F. Ellerton

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Kanbir, S., Clements, M.A.(., Ellerton, N.F. (2018). Review of Pertinent Literature. In: Using Design Research and History to Tackle a Fundamental Problem with School Algebra. History of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59204-6_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59204-6_5

Published : 29 October 2017

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-59203-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-59204-6

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

THE SELF CONCEPT; A CRITICAL SURVEY OR PERTINENT RESEARCH LITERATURE.

Similar Items

Topographical signature:.

logo

What are some of the reminders on relating the research findings to pertinent literature

ansver

hello kamusta ka?

Explanation:

#carryonflying

pertinent literature meaning in research

Another question on English

question

By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. You can refuse to use cookies by setting the necessary parameters in your browser.

logo

Relating the research findings with pertinent literature:pdf

answer

shempre maaaddict sila at lahat ng ors nila mapupunta dito at ultimo kumain hindi na nila magawa dahil dito.

eye conditions

sasakit ang kanilang mga mata dahil hindi nila mabitawan anfg phone at dahil sa radiation.

pertinent literature meaning in research

Iba pang mga katanungan: English

image

Questions in other subjects:

Konu

By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. You can refuse to use cookies by setting the necessary parameters in your browser.

Nursing Researcher

pertinent literature

This assignment is due tonight 7/8/2018 by 2100 eastern standard time.

This portion contains a review of pertinent literature. By reviewing the literature in your chosen topic, you should demonstrate the gap, or what literature has not addressed, or perhaps addressed inadequately. This demonstrates a need for your proposed research study.

enclosed is an attachment of the instructions and layout for your paper.  Research literature on domestic violence and abusive men and if they can truly recover and provide your findings.

You might also like

Nursing Researcher is a custom writing service that provides online custom-written papers, such as term papers, research papers, thesis papers, essays, dissertations, and other custom writing services inclusive of research materials for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper references.

QUICK LINKS

pertinent literature meaning in research

1-866-515-7710

[email protected]

IMAGES

  1. Summary of pertinent literature review regarding childhood discitis

    pertinent literature meaning in research

  2. Relevant Literature on Digital Divide

    pertinent literature meaning in research

  3. Learn English Words: PERTINENT

    pertinent literature meaning in research

  4. PPT

    pertinent literature meaning in research

  5. Pertinent meaning, usage, quotes, and social examples

    pertinent literature meaning in research

  6. How To Pronounce Pertinent🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈Pronunciation Of Pertinent

    pertinent literature meaning in research

VIDEO

  1. Research design

  2. Literature in general

  3. Rishimoolam In Puthuyugam TV (27/10/2013)

  4. What is Literature? / Basic concept of Literature / Simplest definition of Literature for interview

  5. WHAT IS LITERATURE REVIEW? || ETC

  6. Review of Related Literature

COMMENTS

  1. It is the formal survey of professional literature that is pertinent to the research

    ★★ Tamang sagot sa tanong: It is the formal survey of professional literature that is pertinent to the research

  2. Pertinent Literature: Research Management: Vol 24, No 2

    Taylor & Francis Online may be unavailable for up to 2 hours on Friday 21 June, 22:00 - 02:00 GMT, due to scheduled maintenance work

  3. Review of Pertinent Literature

    This chapter frames the main study described in this book in terms of the theoretical positions of Charles Sanders Peirce, Johann Friedrich Herbart, and Gina Del Campo and Ken Clements

  4. Holdings: THE SELF CONCEPT; A CRITICAL SURVEY OR PERTINENT RESEARCH LITERATURE

    THE SELF CONCEPT; A CRITICAL SURVEY OR PERTINENT RESEARCH LITERATURE. Main Author: WYLIE, RUTH C. Published: NEBRASKA : UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA PRESS, 1961

  5. What are some of the reminders on relating the research findings to pertinent literature

    What are some of the reminders on relating the research findings to pertinent literature. Another question on English. What are the simpliest things in the world?

  6. The self concept a critical survey of pertinent research literature

    Main Author: Wylie, Ruth C. University of Nebraska Press [c1961]. Subjects:*Self. Psychology > Research

  7. Review of Pertinent Literature

    The state of the art about brain metastases (BMs) from gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), a rare condition, is provided with particular attention to the role of radiotherapy

  8. Relating the research findings with pertinent literature:pdf

    In your on words, define stand out, fit in. What kind of conflict did the chatacters face in the story of the stranger. Mrs. agoncillo deposited ₱ 50 000.00 in a bank in her

  9. pertinent literature

    This portion contains a review of pertinent literature. enclosed is an attachment of the instructions and layout for your paper